The CBE Scroll

Blog voices from Christians for Biblical Equality

Deborah

Filed under: Biblical Evidence, Biblical Interpretation — DP at 1:44 pm on Tuesday, April 25, 2006

I found this quote a while back:

Deborah occupies a unique role in Israelite history. Not only is she a judge in the sense of a military leader, but also she is the only judge in the law-court sense of that title (Judg. 4.5) in the book of Judges. Of all the military leaders of the book, only Deborah is called a “prophet.” She is also the only judge to “sing” of the victory, illustrating the creative role played by women as shapers of tradition (cf. Exod. 15.20-21). While some would see Deborah, a female, as an anomaly in all these roles, her contributions should be set alongside those of other women who are pivotal figures in the premonarchic period (Miriam, Jael, Jephthah’s daughter, Samson’s mother). All emerge as strong women with no negative valuation, perhaps because during the period of the judges, a time of social and political crisis, able people of any status could contribute to group efforts. In the rural, agrarian setting of the period of the judges, with the family as the dominant social institution, the important role of women in family life was more readily transferred to matters of public concern than during the monarchy, with its more formal and hierarchical power structures. Deborah as a strong woman reflects her own gifts as well as a relatively open phase of Israelite society.
—Carol L. Meyers, “Deborah,” The Oxford Companion to the Bible, ed. Bruce M. Metzger and Michael D. Coogan (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993) 161.

It does seem to be the case that in smaller and less “sophisticated” communities, women have greater freedom in exercising their gifts–even if nobody thinks of what they’re doing as “leadership.” Certainly the growth of the early church, when Christians met around the dinner table rather than in a cathedral and “family” was a principle metaphor for what they were doing, it seems women’s gifts flourished. Sociologists tell us that in new religious sects there is often a greater degree of gender equality than a generation or so later in the movement’s history when things start getting institutionalized.

If that is the case, perhaps Deborah should be a sort of “patron saint” for the Christian egalitarian movement. She exercised her obvious skills in leadership, religious instruction, and jurisprudence (not to mention poetry!) in an era when those skills were needed and therefore welcome.

8 Comments »

164

Comment by Can Dance

April 25, 2006 @ 10:34 pm

I love Deborah. Until I became an egal, I hadn’t heard much about her. Then I realised why — she is darn hard to “explain away” in terms of her leadership ability. And the things they say are absurd! She is less of a leader because she rendered her judgements under a tree and she was ultimately submissive to Barak? Puh-lease. It is so unscripturally supported, it’s almost funny except that people are desperate to erase her or something, so they do believe it. Now that is just sad.

166

Comment by DP

April 26, 2006 @ 9:47 am

Sitting under a tree makes you less of a leader? I have never heard that one before! Seems to me if you live it a hot, arid climate, sitting under a tree while you conduct your business would make you, well, fairly intelligent :-)

168

Comment by Lori

April 26, 2006 @ 10:16 am

Actually, there is a way to explain her away. She was just doing the job because God couldn’t find any mean to do it (insert smiley rolling its eyes here). Which is a pretty sad comment on the nation of Israel at the time, since they had all those men and God couldn’t find a single one to be a leader.

As for patron saints, I’d rather nominate either Priscilla or Phoebe. Phoebe was probably a deaconess in the early church, and Priscilla ministered right alongside her husband and Paul. In fact, Priscilla is my favorite woman in the Bible.

171

Comment by Can Dance

April 26, 2006 @ 2:23 pm

oh no, Phoebe was a deacon. there is no denying that one. can’t get around it, unless you want to say Timothy wasn’t a deacon. and “deaconess” didn’t exist either, it wasn’t feminized, just deacon. not gender distinction there :)

I have heard the explain away Deborah because of her femaleness because there was no man to do the job. again, puh lease, there is NOT A WORD of scripture to support this degrading view of Deborah and her ministry. other than preconcieved notions of how much women are allowed to be people.

183

Comment by LJR

April 28, 2006 @ 4:52 pm

Can Dance:

I’d like to ask the next anti-equality person who uses in my presence the “no man available” argument about Deborah if Lappidoth and Barak were just chopped liver.

IMHO, Lappidoth would have had to be very secure in himself, his marriage, and his relationship with God for Deborah to be able to do all she did. A lesser person would have tried to restrict her and “be the man”, so to speak. Barak wanted God’s prophet at his side, no matter who that prophet happened to be — not exactly the behavior of a man who wasn’t trying to live for God. That makes two men God could easily have chosen, but didn’t. He wanted Deborah instead. Why? Because He can use anyone he chooses.

859

Comment by Cecily Paterson

May 25, 2006 @ 8:39 pm

We just looked at Deborah in Bible study. My dear friend, who is not of the same views as me, said, “But why was she a judge? Because women aren’t allowed to lead men! Why did God choose her?”
My response: “Why wouldn’t God choose her?”

It was a challenging study for my friends who are complementarians. I had trouble not grinning all the way through.

Comment by Kathryn Vance

June 13, 2006 @ 4:17 pm

I am thankful for all the responses here. Thankfully there are godly men like Lappidoth who are secure enough to encourage a wife like Deborah to fulfill her calling in the Lord. We cannot commend such men enough, as often they take as much heat as their wives do. There were indeed men God could have chosen (Huldah the prophetess lived in the time of Jeremiah and Zephaniah, yet God chose her not them to give prophecy to King Josiah); indeed I suggest that Barak was willing to usurp Deborah’s authority at first by attempting to call the shots when we first see him, and lost the honor of capturing Sisera the enemy general because of it, as Deborah warned him he would. Of course, he was properly rebuked by this incident, and showed his change of heart by celebrating the victory with Deborah. They were both mentioned in the Hebrews 11 Hall of Faith. I wonder if there weren’t two Judges of Israel named Deborah. Her husband’s name was given as a way of identifying which Deborah was being discussed at that time, so was that a Scriptural subtle nuance indicating the existence of another Deborah as Judge? I have often wondered about that lately. Sometimes the original language can contain certain nuances not readily seen in the English Bible.

Comment by Jerry Guidicy

August 18, 2006 @ 11:15 am

Lappidoth, was a Godly man, Deborah would not have married an ungodly man. God chose her because He wanted her to save the Jewish nation. You could ask why he chose a woman for everything. Why did he chose a woman to be a companion for Adam, why not a man?
Why did He chose Rahab to save the Jewish nation? Why did He chose a man to tend the garden? Why not a monkey?

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>