<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spiritual June Cleaver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/</link>
	<description>Blog voices from Christians for Biblical Equality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-30621</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-30621</guid>
		<description>Hello everyone.  I don&#039;t think anyone is commenting on this particular post anymore (the last post was dated 10-17-06, 4 months ago), I&#039;m sorry for my late comment, this is my first time reading this.

I have been a christian for 17yrs and noticed the oppressive attitudes towards women in ministry and in marriage.  It was very discouraging, because on the inside, I knew that this discrimination was wrong, but not having a response almost left me a prey, but it was these trials that forced me deeper into God&#039;s Word for His truth.  

I believe in the commands of Christ to &quot;love the Lord your God and your neighbor as yourself&quot;, godly qualified women in ministry, and mutual love and respect in marriage, but I do have to voice a concern that I have.    If a husband and wife begin to have children and the wife feels that the role of nurturing children is oppressive and is a part of the &quot;patriarchal&quot; belief system, then I believe we have sent a dangerous message to women.  

The world sends the message that materialism = success,  but the fruit has been chaos.

I hope there is a balanced message here at CBE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone.  I don&#8217;t think anyone is commenting on this particular post anymore (the last post was dated 10-17-06, 4 months ago), I&#8217;m sorry for my late comment, this is my first time reading this.</p>
<p>I have been a christian for 17yrs and noticed the oppressive attitudes towards women in ministry and in marriage.  It was very discouraging, because on the inside, I knew that this discrimination was wrong, but not having a response almost left me a prey, but it was these trials that forced me deeper into God&#8217;s Word for His truth.  </p>
<p>I believe in the commands of Christ to &#8220;love the Lord your God and your neighbor as yourself&#8221;, godly qualified women in ministry, and mutual love and respect in marriage, but I do have to voice a concern that I have.    If a husband and wife begin to have children and the wife feels that the role of nurturing children is oppressive and is a part of the &#8220;patriarchal&#8221; belief system, then I believe we have sent a dangerous message to women.  </p>
<p>The world sends the message that materialism = success,  but the fruit has been chaos.</p>
<p>I hope there is a balanced message here at CBE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Rowell</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-9844</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Rowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-9844</guid>
		<description>I had someone ask me if Rob Bell and Mark Driscoll are associated with one another.  The answer is no.  

Mark Driscoll&#039;s &quot;Mars Hill Church Seattle&quot; has zero association with Rob Bell&#039;s &quot;Mars Hill Bible Church&quot; in Michigan.  The name similarity is coincidental.  

However it is easy to get confused since both are young pastors who planted churches that absolutely boomed.  Both engage with culture, stress innovation and are sought-after speakers.  Both are working hard to channel the huge growth of their churches into service to the surrounding community.       

Driscoll is a conservative Reformed complementarian whereas Bell is from Wheaton College and Fuller Seminary.  I have never heard Bell talk or write about his views on women in ministry but all signs point to him being an egalitarian.    

Driscoll writes this week in a blog post addressing the Salon article entitled &quot;It&#039;s Always Something at Mars Hill Church&quot; that:

Apparently, I am Rob Bell’s evil doppelganger [evil twin], which I guess is true, but deciding which one of us is in fact the evil one would depend on whether you are a theological liberal or conservative.

http://theresurgence.com/md_blog_2006-09-19_its_always_something_at_mars_hill_church</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had someone ask me if Rob Bell and Mark Driscoll are associated with one another.  The answer is no.  </p>
<p>Mark Driscoll&#8217;s &#8220;Mars Hill Church Seattle&#8221; has zero association with Rob Bell&#8217;s &#8220;Mars Hill Bible Church&#8221; in Michigan.  The name similarity is coincidental.  </p>
<p>However it is easy to get confused since both are young pastors who planted churches that absolutely boomed.  Both engage with culture, stress innovation and are sought-after speakers.  Both are working hard to channel the huge growth of their churches into service to the surrounding community.       </p>
<p>Driscoll is a conservative Reformed complementarian whereas Bell is from Wheaton College and Fuller Seminary.  I have never heard Bell talk or write about his views on women in ministry but all signs point to him being an egalitarian.    </p>
<p>Driscoll writes this week in a blog post addressing the Salon article entitled &#8220;It&#8217;s Always Something at Mars Hill Church&#8221; that:</p>
<p>Apparently, I am Rob Bell’s evil doppelganger [evil twin], which I guess is true, but deciding which one of us is in fact the evil one would depend on whether you are a theological liberal or conservative.</p>
<p><a href="http://theresurgence.com/md_blog_2006-09-19_its_always_something_at_mars_hill_church" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Ftheresurgence.com%2Fmd_blog_2006-09-19_its_always_something_at_mars_hill_church','http%3A%2F%2Ftheresurgence.com%2Fmd_blog_2006-09-19_its_always_something_at_mars_hill_church')" rel="nofollow">http://theresurgence.com/md_blog_2006-09-19_its_always_something_at_mars_hill_church</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJR</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-9013</link>
		<dc:creator>LJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-9013</guid>
		<description>Lori: I didn&#039;t think you were criticizing. You&#039;re telling it like it is (and would have been). 

I don&#039;t even want to _think_ about what would have happened if we&#039;d been married!  *shudders*  A marriage could never have lasted under those circumstances. Either I would have been forced back into ungodly subservience, or I&#039;d have had to get out and live under church condemnation because of his behavior. (He had become a danger to himself at one point, and indirectly would have been a danger to me if we had been married.) Of course, either way, all the problems would have been &quot;my&quot; fault. (Yeah, like I could have caused his behavior problems before we ever met, much less made him change.)

Unilateral female submission and a lack of male accountability led to suffering and spiritual bondage. Mutual submission and mutual accountability led to freedom and spiritual growth. There is no question in my mind or for those who know us what is truly the Biblical way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori: I didn&#8217;t think you were criticizing. You&#8217;re telling it like it is (and would have been). </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even want to _think_ about what would have happened if we&#8217;d been married!  *shudders*  A marriage could never have lasted under those circumstances. Either I would have been forced back into ungodly subservience, or I&#8217;d have had to get out and live under church condemnation because of his behavior. (He had become a danger to himself at one point, and indirectly would have been a danger to me if we had been married.) Of course, either way, all the problems would have been &#8220;my&#8221; fault. (Yeah, like I could have caused his behavior problems before we ever met, much less made him change.)</p>
<p>Unilateral female submission and a lack of male accountability led to suffering and spiritual bondage. Mutual submission and mutual accountability led to freedom and spiritual growth. There is no question in my mind or for those who know us what is truly the Biblical way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-9011</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-9011</guid>
		<description>We talked above about ways to spread the biblical truth of egalitarianism.  Well, I have a really creative idea, and I would love to get some input.  I&#039;ve created a blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://wwwanamchara.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anamchara&lt;/a&gt;, and I would for y&#039;all to come over and give me some input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We talked above about ways to spread the biblical truth of egalitarianism.  Well, I have a really creative idea, and I would love to get some input.  I&#8217;ve created a blog <a href="http://wwwanamchara.blogspot.com/" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwwwanamchara.blogspot.com%2F','Anamchara')" rel="nofollow">Anamchara</a>, and I would for y&#8217;all to come over and give me some input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-9008</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-9008</guid>
		<description>Lori, that subject would make a whole new blog. What to do if one partner changes and the other one doesn&#039;t. If they were both comps. when they married, what if one discovers egal., and the other is firmly opposed? Or, if they were egals., but now one is wavering toward compism? The dynamics would change too, depending on husband or wife, because if the husband was egal., but the wife believed in &quot;male leadership&quot;, perhaps he could &quot;lead&quot; her to Biblical equality; it would, however, be harder for an egal. wife to lead a firmly comp. husband to equality, unless he saw qualities in her that he knew were godly as a result of egal. It would be hard for him to give up that authority, but with God all things are possible, if he is sensitive to the Holy Spirit&#039;s leading. Compism has a way of hardening as the years go by, but I have seen people change before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori, that subject would make a whole new blog. What to do if one partner changes and the other one doesn&#8217;t. If they were both comps. when they married, what if one discovers egal., and the other is firmly opposed? Or, if they were egals., but now one is wavering toward compism? The dynamics would change too, depending on husband or wife, because if the husband was egal., but the wife believed in &#8220;male leadership&#8221;, perhaps he could &#8220;lead&#8221; her to Biblical equality; it would, however, be harder for an egal. wife to lead a firmly comp. husband to equality, unless he saw qualities in her that he knew were godly as a result of egal. It would be hard for him to give up that authority, but with God all things are possible, if he is sensitive to the Holy Spirit&#8217;s leading. Compism has a way of hardening as the years go by, but I have seen people change before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-8968</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-8968</guid>
		<description>Under the post about egal. vs. comp. marriages, we talked about how do comp. husbands enforce their authority if the wife rebels.  With that in mind, I&#039;m curious, LJR.  If you had been actually married, do you think that your SO would have changed his mind?  I mean, if y&#039;all were married, he would have no reason to change.  He would have all the power in the relationship.  Now, however, you have the freedom to leave, just like he does, so you both have power.  I&#039;m not saying this in any way to criticize.  I&#039;m just curious, given everything we&#039;ve discussed about the dynamics of comp. marriages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the post about egal. vs. comp. marriages, we talked about how do comp. husbands enforce their authority if the wife rebels.  With that in mind, I&#8217;m curious, LJR.  If you had been actually married, do you think that your SO would have changed his mind?  I mean, if y&#8217;all were married, he would have no reason to change.  He would have all the power in the relationship.  Now, however, you have the freedom to leave, just like he does, so you both have power.  I&#8217;m not saying this in any way to criticize.  I&#8217;m just curious, given everything we&#8217;ve discussed about the dynamics of comp. marriages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-8941</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-8941</guid>
		<description>Re: comment #50: Thank you Sally. Re: comment #51: LJR, that sounds like quite a switch! Congratulations on your marriage next spring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: comment #50: Thank you Sally. Re: comment #51: LJR, that sounds like quite a switch! Congratulations on your marriage next spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJR</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-2/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator>LJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-8936</guid>
		<description>Sally, except for switching &quot;husband&quot; with &quot;SO,&quot; (Significant Other) I could have written most of your post. The harder and harder I tried to &quot;submit&quot; to him and be a &quot;good Christian&quot; by my SBC church&#039;s standards, the _worse_ his behavior got -- and he considered himself a &quot;good Christian&quot;! If unilateral submission were the truth, we&#039;d both be shining examples of godliness because I really submitted like I was taught, and he had all the control. Obviously, that didn&#039;t work. 

When I discovered Biblical equality, it rocked our relationship. He fought it tooth and nail, and he did all kinds of things to try to force me back into line (although he will deny this if you ask him!). When he realized I wasn&#039;t tolerating the old routines anymore, he finally started getting serious about making necessary changes in his life. At the same time, Biblical equality rebuilt my own faith in God and put me in a position to straighten out a lot of flawed theology. 

So what happened? My former non-reader SO is now studying apologetics like crazy and spending more time in bookstores than I do (that&#039;s saying a lot). Even though he still doesn&#039;t quite &quot;get&quot; Biblical equality, he&#039;s starting to read CBE journals and think about what it all means. He&#039;s treating me better, recognizing my strengths, and finding his own strengths. We switched churches. Most importantly, we&#039;re tying the knot next spring. None of that could possibly have happened if I had stayed in the old ways and never learned about Biblical equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally, except for switching &#8220;husband&#8221; with &#8220;SO,&#8221; (Significant Other) I could have written most of your post. The harder and harder I tried to &#8220;submit&#8221; to him and be a &#8220;good Christian&#8221; by my SBC church&#8217;s standards, the _worse_ his behavior got &#8212; and he considered himself a &#8220;good Christian&#8221;! If unilateral submission were the truth, we&#8217;d both be shining examples of godliness because I really submitted like I was taught, and he had all the control. Obviously, that didn&#8217;t work. </p>
<p>When I discovered Biblical equality, it rocked our relationship. He fought it tooth and nail, and he did all kinds of things to try to force me back into line (although he will deny this if you ask him!). When he realized I wasn&#8217;t tolerating the old routines anymore, he finally started getting serious about making necessary changes in his life. At the same time, Biblical equality rebuilt my own faith in God and put me in a position to straighten out a lot of flawed theology. </p>
<p>So what happened? My former non-reader SO is now studying apologetics like crazy and spending more time in bookstores than I do (that&#8217;s saying a lot). Even though he still doesn&#8217;t quite &#8220;get&#8221; Biblical equality, he&#8217;s starting to read CBE journals and think about what it all means. He&#8217;s treating me better, recognizing my strengths, and finding his own strengths. We switched churches. Most importantly, we&#8217;re tying the knot next spring. None of that could possibly have happened if I had stayed in the old ways and never learned about Biblical equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://blog.cbeinternational.org/2006/09/the-spiritual-june-cleaver/comment-page-1/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cbeinternational.org/?p=81#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>Re #46: Kathryn, Your comment is very helpful. I used to &#039;enable&#039; my husband to behave in unhelpful ways because I kept quiet about it, thinking it was better to submit to whatever he did. It&#039;s only since I&#039;ve started to see the principle of both truth and love in relationships that our relationship has been so much better. 

My husband tends to be passive aggressive. I tend to be co-dependent. Who am I going to be corrected and encouraged by if its not him? And who is he going to be corrected by and encouraged by if it&#039;s not me? No-one else is going to do it, because no one else loves him enough.

If I really love him, then I will tell him the truth. And I&#039;ll do it in a way that shows I really love him. The two - love and truth - work most effectively in combination with each other.

Since we&#039;ve started to do this, and have committed to truth telling in love, our marriage has improved 100 per cent.

I don&#039;t think my friend even knows the language of enabling. I try to recommend &#039;How People Grow&#039; or Boundaries by Cloud and Townsend to people. They are really wise with marriage and relationships, without any of the &#039;submit&#039;/&#039;headship&#039; language that can confuse people.  Instead they just go for the biblical principles of love and truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re #46: Kathryn, Your comment is very helpful. I used to &#8216;enable&#8217; my husband to behave in unhelpful ways because I kept quiet about it, thinking it was better to submit to whatever he did. It&#8217;s only since I&#8217;ve started to see the principle of both truth and love in relationships that our relationship has been so much better. </p>
<p>My husband tends to be passive aggressive. I tend to be co-dependent. Who am I going to be corrected and encouraged by if its not him? And who is he going to be corrected by and encouraged by if it&#8217;s not me? No-one else is going to do it, because no one else loves him enough.</p>
<p>If I really love him, then I will tell him the truth. And I&#8217;ll do it in a way that shows I really love him. The two &#8211; love and truth &#8211; work most effectively in combination with each other.</p>
<p>Since we&#8217;ve started to do this, and have committed to truth telling in love, our marriage has improved 100 per cent.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think my friend even knows the language of enabling. I try to recommend &#8216;How People Grow&#8217; or Boundaries by Cloud and Townsend to people. They are really wise with marriage and relationships, without any of the &#8216;submit&#8217;/'headship&#8217; language that can confuse people.  Instead they just go for the biblical principles of love and truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

