The CBE Scroll

Blog voices from Christians for Biblical Equality

What is most important ?

Filed under: Gender Equality — Mimi at 8:43 am on Saturday, April 25, 2009
  

Is gender the most important factor in the equation of life?  

 Do you find yourself reluctant to attend women’s retreats because they  tend to focus on things like fashion, women’s emotions, crafts,and new forms of stomach exercises? Are you confused by so-called Christian blogs for women, where again, the discussions center on fashion and emotions? I was recently invited to develop a women’s track as part of an international conference for evangelicals, only to learn that the conveners intended to include workshops for women on fashion, beauty, and women’s emotions. Is that what inspires us today as Christian women?When I consider how Christians might better mentor women today, I reflect upon prominent Christian women such as Sojourner Truth (1797-1883), Pandita Ramabai (1858-1922), and Catherine Booth (1829-1890). How did they edify women in their day? They called women (and the world as a whole) to resist the temptation to see all of life in terms of gender. They believed that the most important factor in the equation of life was not gender, but our newness of life in Christ!

Sojourner Truth—a freed American slavechallenged those who suggested that because Christ was male, women may not vote or preach. Like other prominent theologians such as Gregory of Nazianzus and Karl Barth, Sojourner Truth believed in the universality of Christ’s sacrifice, affirmed by Scripture, the creeds, and the church councils. The point of the incarnation is that Christ became flesh for all people, not just for males.

Consider Pandita Ramabai, a Hindu woman who came to faith and established the Mukti Mission—considered one of the best examples of Christian faith in action in all of India. Ramabai was convinced that gender should not limit the service women might perform. An outspoken advocate of women’s intellectual ability, she and other women not only translated Scripture from Greek and Hebrew into Marathi—a prominent Indian dialect—but her mission also printed and distributed the Scriptures in Marathi. Though women were not well-educated in her day, Pandita’s newness of life in Christ completely reframed her self-identity as a woman, not according to cultural standards, but according to scriptural standards. Pandita’s rebirth in Christ gave her new vision for service, and she used her intellectual gifts to bring the world a Bible translation in her language. For Pandita, newness of life meant that women’s gifts and achievements are as limitless as the power of the Holy Spirit.

Remember Catherine Booth, cofounder of the Salvation Army with her husband William Booth. Catherine spent most of her life preaching and working among prostitutes and the poor in London’s East end. As part of her passion for the good news of the gospel, Catherine said, “it would be a happy day in England when Christian women turn their attention from poodles and terriers to the poor and destitute.”

Perhaps today, like Catherine Booth, we should make a similar declaration. It will be a happy day when churches, blogs, and Christian conferences view women not through gender roles and expectations but through the power of the Holy Spirit, turning women’s attention from self (fashion and emotions) to the lost, the abused, the friendless, and to those who do not know the saving and sanctifying power of the Holy Spirit! From the women who proclaimed the Lord risen on Easter morning, to the great evangelical women of the 20th century, women’s newness of life centers not on their gender, but on the power of the Holy Spirit active in their lives. Let us consider the outcome of their lives, and imitate their faith, as Hebrews tells us (13:7)

Friends, join us this July 24-26 as we consider these themes more closely at CBE’s 2009 conference entitled: “Are Men from Mars and Women from Venus? A Biblical Response to Gender Difference.” Share in the discussion with others this summer!

Mimi Haddad
President

 

A Gift of Poor Singing

Filed under: Personal Story — Hubert Edgar at 5:25 pm on Saturday, April 18, 2009

A minister without the right gift: that was Mrs. Doll. I knew her in the church where I grew up. She prepared the bread and wine for the communion services and, every few weeks, sang a “special” during Sunday morning service.

 

Let me be clear: Mrs. Doll couldn’t carry a tune in a semi. Her gifts in the musical area were all under someone else’s Christmas tree. As a child, I dreaded her standing behind the pulpit to sing.

 

As a teen and adult, I looked forward to it. You see, her non-gift let the Spirit give me a gift: to get past the noise to the harmony with God on Mrs. Doll’s face and in Mrs. Doll’s life. Then, I saw her gift. I saw a farm woman who had dealt with a hard life and had in turn given much of herself to others with hard lives. And, I saw a woman who had a deep desire to praise her God in front of His people. In front of her people.

 

Her gifts were faith and love, what I’ve sometimes heard called “helps.” Her ministry was almost invisible, being done mainly in her home and the homes of others. God chose to have her express her love of God to her church, and to me specifically, by humble singing and humble living. I don’t think she could have sung in a large church. But, God placed her in a small one so she could minister in worship services with her nearly-non-gift.

 

When we think of giftedness, we sometimes get all caught up with who gets to give the sermons, perform marriages, etc. As churches, we need to be seeing to it that everyone is getting to use their God-given gifts, even seemingly itty bitty gifts.

 

…many who are first will be last, and the last first.” Mark 10:31 (TNIV)

What is the significance of the “yet” found in 1 Tim. 2:12

Filed under: Gender Equality — JLP at 7:21 am on Tuesday, April 7, 2009

The following is from the Online Greek Interlinear.

This is the straight English translation of the Greek for 1st Timothy 2:12.

TO-BE-TEACHING YET to-WOMAN NOT I-AM-permitting NOT-YET TO-BE-domineerING OF-MAN but TO-BE IN QUIETness

Twice in this verse the word “yet” appears. However I have never found a version of the Bible that contains even one “yet.” What is the significance of the appearance of “yet” in this verse to the way it is being translated?

Here are two explanations of 1st Timothy that take “yet” into account.

Beyond Sex Roles, Gilbert Bilezikian, Page 180:

Scholars have already pointed out that the present tense of Paul’s “I do not permit…” has the force of “I do not permit now a woman to teach”.

Women in the Maze, Ruth Tucker, Page 114-115:

In verse 12, Paul goes on to say, “I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man.” Again the verb-in this instance, the present tense is important. The phrase could be properly translated, “I am presently permitting no woman to teach…,” with the implication that this was Paul’s policy for the time being.

In light of the two occurrences of the word “yet” in this verse, how do you feel it should be translated?

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 493 access attempts in the last 7 days.