The CBE Scroll

Blog voices from Christians for Biblical Equality

Servant Leadership ?

Written by: on Monday, February 15, 2010

Servant Leadership or Christian Service?

“Jesus called them together and said, ‘You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave—just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.’”
(Matthew 20:25-28, TNIV)

How many of us feel uneasy when we are told that men, rather than women, are called to be “servant leaders?” Perhaps we are confused by this notion—that men alone are to be “servant-leaders”—because it contains an important truth though it carries that truth only part of the way. What do I mean?

Scripture speaks of the Christian life, for both males and females, as one of service. Jesus said that unlike the Gentiles who exercised authority over others, among his followers those who wanted to be first must become like slaves, just as Christ came not to be served, but to serve. There is no mention of gender in this important passage in Matthew 20:25-28, nor is there any mention of authority.

Similarly, Paul also said that he became a slave to everyone for the sake of the gospel (1 Corinthians 9:19). Paul became a slave not because he was male but because he was being renewed in the image of Christ. The gospel calls that all Christians take up their cross and follow Jesus, not because of their gender, but because of their desire to be followers of Jesus.

Celebrating the servant-leadership of all God’s people!

Mimi Haddad, President of CBE

.

13 Comments »

Comment by leigh

February 15, 2010 @ 7:35 pm

Two things:
I always wondered what hierarchal complementarians do with the whole “the last will be first and the first will be last” thrust of scripture, as it appears they are pushing women into the very front of the line in the afterlife (that’s partly serious and partly my feeble attempt at humor).

And the other thing I wondered is when we lost sight of Jesus as the example for ALL Christians: not for male Christians, only.

Comment by Deborah

February 15, 2010 @ 10:10 pm

Leigh–LOL. Some comps do cover that with a teaching stating that women are *eternally* under the men as part of God’s intended order of things. But I do suspect some long-suffering women will have God’s special commendation, as will some who were bold to step out from being “under” as the only possible path to pursue His calls upon them.

Comment by Amanda B.

February 16, 2010 @ 12:18 am

I have wondered for a long time how complementarians at once believe servant-leadership and the subordination of women. If leadership is service, then how can there really be a problem with women serving men?

Comment by Bridget Jack Meyers

February 16, 2010 @ 8:05 pm

I don’t wish to make generalizations about complementarians. “Complementarianism” is far from a monolithic entity. Some complementarians are much more thoughtful, soft-spoken, and persuasive than others and I respect that they are acting out of what they see as commitment to the biblical text, even if I think their conclusions are wrong. I think it’s these comps who do have a heart for servant-leadership.

That said, other comps wouldn’t care about servant-leadership if it kicked them in the face. All they care about is making sure that men are the only ones who get to wear the big, shiny “pastor” crown. Hard complementarianism = an exercise in missing the point of Christianity.

Comment by leigh

February 17, 2010 @ 7:48 am

Actually, I know a hard complementarian who, speaking about my relationship with him before he left our church…

He was kind
respectful even though he knew we had differing opinions on some theological issues (we talked about it, some)
never called me by my husband’s name or offered any commentary on my not taking my husband’s name (an occurrence that was not uncommon when relating with other members of that church)

He was an even newer Christian that I was, and I believe he has a heart for God, and is seeking God’s will. I don’t believe he is either consciously or merely a power seeker. I do see that he has fallen (walked, whatever) into patriarchal Christianity, and I don’t believe that is the best for him or for his wife or for their (future?) child(ren).

This makes me angry at some level, yes, but as he was always a friendly face in the crowd, it mostly makes me sad.

Yet at the same time, I consider all complementarianism to be abusive at some level, because it all (to my limited knowledge) promotes the idea that women were created by God for the purpose of serving men. Even though it’s sometimes couched in more demure language.

Comment by Rev. J. Robinson

February 18, 2010 @ 7:22 pm

It would seem that both Comps and Pats view themselves (the men) as the church head, the family head and head of anything else they want to be head of, but it truly causes me to wonder….whatever happened to the Lord Jesus Christ being the HEAD of the church and the family? Whenever you have more than one HEAD, it really has become a monster or a freak, good for a sideshow or two. I sometimes get depressed that this is why unbelievers look at the church and decide this is not for them.

As for me, the Lord Jesus Christ is my only head and furthermore, He is the only COVERING that I need. If the Lord doesn’t ORDAIN

Comment by Rev. J. Robinson

February 18, 2010 @ 7:25 pm

(sorry, my fingers slipped and I hit ‘enter’)

If the Lord doesn’t ORDAIN, then it doesn’t matter how many people sponsored ordinations that you acquire. I used to believe it was important to acquire man-based ordination until I really read the Holy Scriptures and it was the Lord Jesus who SENT His disciples out to serve others.

Comment by Liz

February 19, 2010 @ 3:14 am

I have written this before, but for those who missed it……

One of our wedding presents was a wall plaque with the words

“Christ is the Head of this house.
The unseen guest at every meal.
The silent listener to every conversation”

After 44 years, it still holds pride of place in our dining room and reminds us of who is ‘in charge’ at our place.

Strangely enough, these once popular words are seldom seen in Christian bookshops now………I wonder why ?

Comment by A. amos Love

February 19, 2010 @ 2:01 pm

Hmmm? Can’t seem to find “Servant -Leader” in my antiquated KJV.

Didn’t Jesus tell “His disciples” NOT to be called “Mastr/Leader.”
Mat 23:10. And none did. They all called themselves servants.

Rom 1:1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ,
Php 1:1 Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ,
Col 4:12 Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Christ,
Tit 1:1 Paul, a servant of God,
Jas 1:1 James, a servant of God
2Pe 1:1 Simon Peter, a servant

His disciples all called themselves “servants,”
none called themselves “leaders.” None? None.
None called themselves “servant-leader.” None.

And every “Servant-Leader” I’ve ever met… Eventually became…
The “Leader” of the “servants.”

And every “Servant-Leader” I’ve ever met…
Also had the “Title” Reverend. What’s up with that? ;-)
Any one with the “Title” Reverend in the Bible?

And pastor?

In the Bible, How many people… have the title pastor?
In the Bible, How many people are… referred to as pastor?
In the Bible, How many people are… ordained as a pastor?
In the Bible, How many congregations are… led by a pastor?

Titles become idols.
Pastors become masters.

And you have the beginnig of “Spiritual Abuse.”

And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold:
them also I must bring, and they shall “hear my voice;”
and there shall be “one” fold, and “one” shepherd.
John 10:16

One Fold – One Shepherd – One Voice.
If Not Now, When?

Comment by jlp

February 21, 2010 @ 8:43 am

Amos – everything you say is so powerful. I especially liked when you said:

And every “Servant-Leader” I’ve ever met… Eventually became…
The “Leader” of the “servants.”

I think that is actually how some comps understand the term “servant leader.”

Comment by Tami M

February 24, 2010 @ 3:29 pm

Christ is the head of our marriage too. But in a Sunday School discussion on headship, a lady (now the wife of a pastor) in frustration asked “Who’s in charge when Christ isn’t?”

Comment by Liz

February 24, 2010 @ 5:44 pm

That’s an amazing question because if Christ isn’t in charge, then it will be a human and that would be less than ideal and open the door for power plays.

Comment by leigh

February 25, 2010 @ 11:56 am

I find it an interesting question because…when is God *not* in charge? How odd.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 253 access attempts in the last 7 days.