The CBE Scroll

Blog voices from Christians for Biblical Equality

Who Supported Jesus Out of Their Own Resources?

Written by: on Thursday, April 22, 2010

Soon afterwards [Jesus] went on through cities and villages, proclaiming and bringing the good news of the kingdom of God. The twelve were with him, as well as some women who had been cured of evil spirits and infirmities: Mary, called Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out, and Joanna, the wife of Herod’s steward Chuza, and Susanna, and many others, who provided for them out of their resources (Luke 8:1-3, NRSV).

One of the arguments that complementarians make for women staying at home is that it is God’s plan for men to work and financially support the family. As long as I’ve been on the other side of the argument, pointing out that women have always worked and supported their families monetarily, it was only last week when it hit me what these verses were saying. I’ve used these verses to show that women were disciples and followed Jesus in his travels just as the 12 did. But last week it hit me between the eyes: Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Susanna plus other women “provided for them out of their resources.”  The Greek word translated as resources can mean property, possessions, resources, or means. These women financially supported Jesus and his ministry from their own finances.

I’m sure some would say that what they gave Jesus was really the money their husbands made. This could be true for Joanna, but she is the only one with a husband in this passage. Mary Magdalene had no husband, and Susanna is not paired with a husband in these verses. This means their money was theirs. We don’t know how they had these resources. Maybe they were business women like Lydia and Priscilla. Maybe they were widows. But neither woman, nor her resources, is tied to a husband.

It’s a little thing. A little thing that can be easily overlooked. But I think that we should pay attention to this little thing. Women who weren’t tied to a husband, and a married woman who isn’t tied to her home, are following Jesus all over the countryside and supporting him. These little things start adding up to show that roles women played in the Bible are much broader than mother and wife. It also shows the freedom Jesus allowed women to have in his own ministry. He didn’t tell these women to go back home and take care of their husbands and children (and he didn’t tell them to go home, get married, and start having kids). He welcomed them and accepted their support.

These three verses in Luke give us a glimpse of the broader role of women in Jesus’ ministry beyond the home.

9 Comments »

Comment by Don

April 22, 2010 @ 8:44 am

Good insight.

One aspect of Jesus/Yeshua was that he was a rabbi, yet he is a contrast to ALL the other rabbis of the time in how he treated women. So not only did he do the right thing, he did the right thing when no other rabbi did it, it was new with him.

Today it might not be scandalous to travel with women, but back then it was unheard of to travel with unrelated women, and in addition, he let them help pay for it. In context, he was shocking!

Comment by MA

April 22, 2010 @ 4:26 pm

And even if they were married, it’s quite significant that it’s the women’s names which are listed, not the men. They were Jesus’ disciples.

I wholeheartedly agree that the Bible gives little evidence for claims that the role of women is ONLY in the home. It just doesn’t seem like that argument can hold water when there are so many examples of women who served and led in the early church.

Comment by Amanda Beattie

April 25, 2010 @ 2:41 am

It seems to me this also does a lot towards challenging the traditional ideal of godly masculinity. Because surely Jesus was completely secure, settled, and mature in His masculinity. But He let women provide for Him.

Comment by Hubert Edgar

April 27, 2010 @ 1:25 pm

Especially good point, Amanda Beattie!

I think the context would indicate some amount of independent wealth or they could not have traveled so much. Of course, they could have turned the business over to a trusted employee for a time. Still, the point is the same. They had money and they decided how to use it. By accepting it, Jesus honored their choices to give it to God/Him. Women having access to, and control of, their own finances is accepted by God.

The whole stay-at-home-mom thing is wonderful but not divinely mandated. It can be overdone. My Grandmother Seavy was a stay-at-home for decades. Then, my Grandfather Seavy died. Grandmother didn’t even know how to handle the books. However, she not only learned the basics, she successfully bought and ran rental properties and started a Christian bookstore in our town that was open for over two decades. She was a blessing to the community as a pastor’s wife before my grandfather’s death and a businesswoman afterward. Our callings can, and often do, change during our lives. Men and women both need to be flexible enough to follow the Spirit’s leading.

Comment by Shawna R. B. Atteberry

April 29, 2010 @ 1:05 am

Thanks for your comments and insights. And especially Hubert’s insight that over the course of our lives, our roles change.

Amanda I think you are right on with these verses challenging the macho godly man emphasis. Jesus had no problem accepting money from women for his own livelihood and for his ministry to continue.

Thank you for chiming in everyone.

Comment by Liz

April 29, 2010 @ 8:34 pm

These verses are some of many which show the overall attitude which Jesus showed towards all people. There is no mention of treating women differently or having prescribed roles in life. The story of Mary & Martha reinforce the fact that listening and learning from Jesus is to be preferred to household tasks (however necessary they are for us all, women and men alike)

How important it is for us to read the new testament with ears to hear what the Spirit was saying and continues to say to us today. When Jesus left the earth he gave us the command to go and make disciples and to teach those disciples everything he had commanded. It is an interesting exercise to underline exactly what things Jesus commanded.

Comment by judy

April 29, 2010 @ 8:37 pm

The Proverbs 31 woman also had her own money, bought land with it and planted a vineyard (managed a business) herself. One of the differences between Jesus’ time and now is that most jobs were done with the children present (ie a carpenter would most likely have his shop in or near the home, and a child old enough to help would be expected to..) Now we have jobs that take us away from home and the children are not allowed. I think the question is not whether women can work (obviously they can) but how do we raise godly children when so much of our society (including children’s activities: school, sports etc.) is set up to put us in separate places for most of the day.
In the Mishna Ketubot 5:5 Rabbi Simeon ben Gamaliel said: If a man forbade his wife to do any work at all, he must divorce her and pay her the ketuba for idleness leads to insanity.
How do we have the same Old Testament and come to two different conclusions regarding woman’s roles?

Comment by Rachel Ann

May 6, 2010 @ 10:33 pm

This post and all the comments that followed were so encouraging. Thanks to all who contributed to this stream of thought!

Comment by El

May 10, 2010 @ 2:37 pm

I find it interesting that of all the things Jesus was accused of, sexual misconduct was not one of the issues. He obviously lived his life in a way where there was a correct balance between including all people and being above reproach in his actions despite being contrary to society norms. A true model for us.

I just want to offer one comment in reference to post 91230. I think we need to be careful about focusing on Jesus’ “masculinity” and his being male. Instead, the primary focus should be on his humanity. Yes, Jesus was born with a male bodily form but the reason for his coming to earth was profoundly so much more dynamic.
Aida Besancon Spencer has presented a thought provoking article entitled, “Does God Have Gender?” in the Spring 2010 Priscilla Papers. I highly recommend you read it if you haven’t had a chance. She points out something I found very intriguing and crucial to consider. She writes that other than a very few references, it is the Greek word “anthropos” (human) that is used in the New Testament to describe Jesus- not the Greek masculine term “aner” (male).

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 334 access attempts in the last 7 days.