The CBE Scroll

Blog voices from Christians for Biblical Equality

“I no longer live, but Christ lives in me”

Filed under: Gender Equality
Written by: on Monday, February 13, 2012

To what extent does Christ’s completed work on Calvary redeem all of life, and all of our relationships? If, as Scripture teaches, knowing Christ changes everything, should we expect and anticipate the power of the cross to renew our relationships as Christians? The early evangelicals asked similar questions—questions they answered with a high view of the cross.

The early evangelicals were the most cross-centered Christians in all of history, and they were also the first to develop a biblical basis for the emancipation of women and slaves. They believed that Christ’s work on the cross gave rise to a newness of life exhibited through unity and reconciliation between people. Consider Penn-Lewis (1861-1927) an evangelical who believed that the cross ushered in the new creation, where gender, ethnic, and class prejudices no longer excluded people from serving equally in Christ’s body—the church. For Penn-Lewis, the cross provided not only forgiveness for sin (redemption). Calvary was also a place of victory over sin (sanctification) where Christians received power to overcome sin and prejudice. She wrote:

The ’old creation,’ in its form of ’Jew and Gentile,’ must die to make way for a new creation ’after the image of him’ that created them; where…there can be neither Jew nor Greek, there can be neither bond nor free, there can be no male and female; for we are one in Christ Jesus. In the face of these words we cannot wonder that the cross is a stumbling-block, and its message likened to a sword or knife, for it cuts deep into the very core of the pride of the old creation. God’s cure…is not a superficial one…Nothing but the cross will bring about the unity he desires.

Without the cross, we would lack the power to walk in newness of life. But, because of Calvary, gender and ethnic distinctions are no longer opportunities to exclude people but to include them. Baptism replaces circumcision among Christians! The cross does not eliminate gender and ethnic distinctions. Rather, the cross unifies us in these distinctions, making us stronger and more capable because of our differences as members of Christ’s body. Theologians might say that Penn-Lewis’s soteriology—what she understands about salvation—informed her ecclesiology—what she understands about the church.

 

 

 

6 Comments »

Comment by Lamar Wadsworth

February 13, 2012 @ 6:38 am

Penn-Lewis is right. I long ago benefitted from her insights and have been informed by her thought in my teaching and preaching. The only way to maintain the subordinate status of women is to maintain that the redeeming work of Christ is less effective for women than for men. Simply put, the more cross-centered we are, the more egalitarian we will be compelled to be. My friend and seminary classmate, Dr. Molly Marshall, who is now president of Central Baptist Theological Seminary, has a good insight here: “Circumcision, the sign of the old covenant, was received by males only. Baptism, the sign of the new covenant, is received by male and female alike. We have not begun to unpack the significance of that.”

Comment by Laurie

February 14, 2012 @ 10:13 am

Excellent point about baptism versus circumcision, Lamar. I need to keep that in the forefront of my memory. :)

Comment by Don

February 14, 2012 @ 5:43 pm

It is more correct to say that circumcision was the sign of God’s third covenant with Abraham in Gen 17, the earlier 2 are in Gen 12 and 15.

Deu 10:16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no longer stubborn.

This applied to all Israelites, male and female.

Col 2:11 In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ,
Col 2:12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.

This circumcision of our heart is made when we were baptized and by our faith in Jesus in the new covenant.

There is no sign of the new covenant that is specified explicitly as such. This means that different faith groups see things differently, some suggesting water baptism, some communion or perhaps specifically the wine, or some the Holy Spirit, etc.

Comment by Liz

February 15, 2012 @ 4:15 pm

Just love the last statement of this post! I tend to think that many of the misconceptions which arise re how the church functions are a direct result of a poor understanding of all that was achieved when Jesus died and came to life again.

Jesus came to redeems (buy back) what was lost and that includes the equal standing of women and men before God.

Comment by Trevor

February 16, 2012 @ 3:28 am

“Theologians might say that Penn-Lewis’s soteriology—what she understands about salvation—informed her ecclesiology—what she understands about the church.”

I’d have to say that I would find myself in exactly the same position as Jesse P-L in that respect. 2000+ years of church history haven’t done us any favours in helping us to sort through these issues. Ecclesiology is so influenced by church tradition and the theological bent, or experience of the founders of the various denominations. Often we are found to be interpreting Scripture more by our commitment to a particular denominational theological framework than allowing Scripture to speak for itself. Speakers and writers, like JPL cut through all of the religious trappings and help us to see things in a less cluttered light.

In my early years of Christian ministry I absolutely devoured everything that people like JPL, Watchman Nee and other writers of that genre had to offer. It caused me to be somewhat idealistic but fortunately, because we were employed in a non-denominational church setting, there was a lot more freedom to allow Scripture to speak for itself without being bound to toe the denominational line. Even so, we were in a “fellowship” with other, like minded churches, that were very conservative, and this created its own tensions as I began to express egalitarian leanings.

People like JPL are somewhat prophetic in their ministry emphasis in that they bring us back to seeing the simplicity of who it is that we are in Christ and the centrality of the Cross etc. It is there (in Christ, at the Cross) that there can be no racial, ethnic, or gender divide. The institution of the “church” as an organisation rather than an organism is what has made things far more complicated. As an organisation, or denomination granted we have to have structure and recognised leaders etc. It is far more difficult to get it right but here Scripture should inform us, not the way of the world, which is more often than not the case.

Comment by maggiemay

February 16, 2012 @ 6:51 pm

2 many ppl R stuck in the old testament

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 346 access attempts in the last 7 days.